With Leaders Like These...

LeadershipAccording to the DOJ/FBI Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program there are 14,169 county and city law enforcement agencies that participate in their UCR statistics gathering project on crime rates in the US. We can estimate from there that there are, perhaps, at least 15,000 law enforcement agencies in the US since one state, West Virginia, does not participate in the UCR and the data excludes state and federal agencies.

Now, since there are likely 15,000 law enforcement agencies in the US we can roughly conclude that there are probably 15,000 law enforcement leaders (police chiefs and sheriffs) in the US as well… after all, each agency requires that there be an individual responsible for that agency, even when there’s only one employee.

With that in mind, in our 2009 Semi-Annual police misconduct statistics report released last month, there were 207 law enforcement leaders cited in reports of police misconduct. These reports involving police leadership included misconduct issues ranging from policy issues up to criminal acts ranging from theft in office to assault and rape.

Now, 207 divided by the six, the number of months of tracking done so far, gives us an average of 34.5 law enforcement leaders per month who are associated with reports of police misconduct. So far, in the month of October, there have been 26 law enforcement leaders implicated as well. Which, with about a week left, isn’t too far off the average…

…and if that average held it would mean that there would be a projected 414 law enforcement leaders implicated in reported cases of alleged misconduct…

…which would give us a 2.76% misconduct rate for law enforcement leadership… or, for comparison:

Law Enforcement Leadership Misconduct Rate – 2760 per 100k
Law Enforcement Officer Misconduct Rate – 847 per 100k

Need some examples of what kind of police leadership misconduct we’re talking about? Here are a few of the reports taken directly from our National Police Misconduct News Feed for this month alone:

With leadership like this serving as an example to police officers under their command, it’s little wonder that our police misconduct statistics aren’t much higher than they are.

But, this leads us to question those statistics since the law enforcement leaders are ultimately responsible for ensuring that misconduct allegations are properly recorded, investigated, reported, and acted upon… and if those leaders are covering for their own misbehavior, how reliable is the information they release about the misconduct of those under their command?

Ultimately, we also have to question that, if local governments are this lax in selecting those who lead their police agencies, then how much more lax is the selection process for regular police officers?

…and, perhaps equally as pertinent, how is it that elected law enforcement leaders like this keep getting re-elected by the public?

Just something to keep in mind as you may, or may not, be heading into the polls for mid-term local elections this year.

4 comments to With Leaders Like These…